Special Issue on Circumcision in Journal of Medical Ethics

The Journal of Medical Ethics published nine articles relating to Circumcision on 22 May 2013. Please find below a link to each of these articles:

– Joseph Mazor,The child’s interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101318. Find article here.

– David P Lang, Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child’s best interests: why the anatomical details matter, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101520. Find article here.

– Matthew Thomas Johnson, Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101217. Find article here.

– Reinhard Merkel, Holm Putzke, After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101284. Find article here.

– Dena S Davis, Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors?, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101469. Find article here.

– J Steven Svoboda, Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101229. Find article here.

– Robert S Van Howe, Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights, J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101209. Find article here.