Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist’s harmful prescription

JME 2017;43:841-844.
Author: Morten Magelssen
“By way of a case story, two common presuppositions in the academic debate on conscientious objection in healthcare are challenged. First, the debate typically presupposes a sharp division between conscience-based refusals based on personal core moral beliefs and refusals based on professional (eg, medical) reasons. Only the former might involve the moral gravity to warrant accommodation. The case story challenges this division, and it is argued that just as much might sometimes be at stake morally in refusals based on professional reasons.”
Find article here.