CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCATAD 79

Decision date: 13 March 2017
“ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Health Privacy Principles 2, 9 and 11 of the Health Records and Information Protection Act 2003 – whether provision of health information by one administrative unit of an agency to another constitutes ‘disclosure’ – whether diagnosis of alcohol dependence accurate – whether applicant’s diary collected by agency – whether notes collected were irrelevant, excessive, inaccurate or unreasonably intrusive – whether health information disclosed as alleged on 21 May 2015 – meaning of ‘disclosure’ in Health Privacy Principle 11.”
Find decision here.

Sheehan v Kitson (Human Rights) [2016] VCAT 1964

Decision date: 24 November 2016
“On 29 November 2016, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) handed down its decision in relation to an application by four doctors against a former patient, seeking a declaration that the patient had conducted vexatious proceedings against each of them in relation to the provision of medical records.”
Find decision here.

Patients’ Assessment Of Their Health Is Gaining Importance In Treatment

KHN, 5 April 2016
Author: Michelle Andrews
“It may seem like a no-brainer to include patients’ assessments of their physical and mental conditions and quality of life into medical care, but such patient-generated data has traditionally been confined to research rather than clinical settings. Clinicians have typically focused more on physical exams, medical tests and biological measures to guide patient care. However, as patient-centered medical care has taken hold in recent years, there’s been a growing interest in finding ways to use outcomes reported by individuals to help guide care.”
Find article here.